🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.